/  H.R. 3582— Pro-Growth Budgeting Act of 2011

H.R. 3582 - Pro-Growth Budgeting Act of 2011

Bill Text

  • Text of H.R. 3582 PDF XML

    Pro-Growth Budgeting Act of 2011 (Rules Committee Print 112-10, showing the text of the bill as ordered reported by the Committee on the Budget)

  • Text of H. Rept. 112-377, Part 1 PDF XML

    Report from the Committee on the Budget

Rule Information

 

COMMITTEE ACTION:
REPORTED BY VOICE VOTE on Wednesday, February 1, 2012.

FLOOR ACTION ON H. RES. 534: 
Adopted by record vote of 238-179, after agreeing to the previous question by record vote of 238-177, on Thursday, February 2, 2012.  

MANAGERS: Woodall/Hastings

1. Structured rule for H.R. 3578.

2. Provides one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Budget.

3. Waives all points of order against consideration of the bill.

4. Provides that the amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of the Rules Committee Print dated January 25, 2012, shall be considered as adopted, and provides that the bill, as amended, shall be considered as read.

5. Waives all points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended.

6. Makes in order the amendment to H.R. 3578 printed in Part A of the Rules Committee report accompanying the resolution if offered Representative Jackson Lee or her designee. The amendment shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for 10 minutes equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question.

7. Waives all points of order against the amendment printed in Part A of the Rules Committee report.

8. Provides one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

9. Structured rule for H.R. 3582.

10. Provides one hour of general debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Budget.

11. Waives all points of order against consideration of the bill.

12. Makes in order as original text for purposes of amendment the amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of the Rules Committee Print dated January 25, 2012, and provides that the amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read.

13. Waives all points of order against the amendment in the nature of a substitute.

14. Makes in order only those amendments to H.R. 3582 printed in Part B of the Rules Committee report accompanying the resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not by subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question.

15. Waives all points of order against the amendments printed in Part B of the Rules Committee report.

16. Provides one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

 

Amendments

#Version #Sponsor(s)PartySummaryStatus
6Version 1Cicilline (RI)DemocratSUBSTITUTE Would amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to require that, in addition to preparing cost estimates for each bill or resolution reported by any committee of the House, the Congressional Budget Office also prepare an estimate of the number of jobs which would be created, sustained, or lost in carrying out the measure – including regional and State level estimates.Made In Order
2Version 1Connolly (VA)DemocratWithdrawn Would extend the requirement for the Congressional Budget Office to prepare macroeconomic analysis of major legislation to bills or resolutions reported by the Appropriations Committees of each Chamber and would lower the monetary threshold for determining a major bill to legislation in excess of $100 million. Withdrawn
3Version 1Connolly (VA)DemocratWould extend the requirement for the Congressional Budget Office to prepare macroeconomic analysis of major legislation to bills or resolutions reported by the Appropriations Committees of each Chamber. Made In Order
9Version 1Flake, Jeff (AZ)RepublicanWould lower the threshold for requiring a dynamic score from .25% of the current GDP to $5 billion.Made In Order
5Version 1Fudge (OH)DemocratWould add income equality among the variables used to determine the economic impact of the bill. Made In Order
10Version 1Jackson Lee (TX)DemocratLate Would require the Congressional Budget Office, to the extent practicable, to include a microeconomic and statistical component in order to ascertain the potential impact of the Act on small businesses.Submitted
11Version 1Jackson Lee (TX)DemocratLate Would require CBO to include as part of their macroeconomic analysis estimates of the potential impact, if any, on HUB ZONE areas as defined by the Small Business Act.Made In Order
4Version 1Peters (MI)DemocratWould add a findings section addressing the macroeconomic impact of the tax cuts of 2001 and 2003.Made In Order
7Version 1Quigley (IL)DemocratWould require the CBO to prepare a macroeconomic impact analysis for any bill or resolution that provides aggregate new budget authority for any fiscal year for infrastructure spending estimated under Section 402 to be greater than 0.25 percent of GDP. The analysis would only be done for those sections of the bill or resolution that contain infrastructure spending. Submitted
8Version 1Quigley (IL)DemocratWould require the CBO to establish a website where taxpayers could enter their annual income and receive an estimate of the amount of their projected contribution to or receipt from any applicable major bill or resolution over the next 10 years, assuming the taxpayer has constant annual income. Made In Order
1Version 1Walz (MN)DemocratWould include interest rates among the major economic variables to be estimated in the macroeconomic economic impact analysis.Made In Order