Print

H.J.Res. 79

Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2012

Rule Hearing Information:

Meeting Time:  Thursday, September 15, 2011 at 10:00 AM in H-313 The Capitol

To watch this hearing, click here.  

For more information on the hearing, click here.

Resources:

  • Text of H.J.Res. 79 — Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2012 [PDF][XML]
     
  • For a copy of the rule, click here.  
    For a copy of H.Res. 399, click here.
    For a copy of H.Rept. 112-207, click here. 

Amendments:
#Version #Sponsor(s)PartySummaryStatus
#2Version 1Norton (DC)DemocratWould authorize the District of Columbia government to obligate and expend its local funds for all of fiscal year 2012.Submitted
#1Version 1Rogers, Harold (KY)RepublicanWould modify the across-the-board reduction that ensures the resolution is consistent with the total discretionary spending cap in the Budget Control Act of 2011. The amendment is necessary because of a scoring change made after the introduction of the resolution. Made In Order
      

Rule Information for H.J. Res. 79

COMMITTEE ACTION:
REPORTED BY VOICE VOTE on Thursday, September 15, 2011.

FLOOR ACTION ON H. RES. 399: 
Laid on the table, pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 405, on Wednesday, September 21, 2011.  

MANAGERS: Woodall/Slaughter

1. Closed rule.

2. Provides one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations.

3. Waives all points of order against consideration of the joint resolution.

4. Provides that the amendment printed in the Rules Committee report accompanying the resolution shall be considered as adopted.

5. Provides that the joint resolution, as amended, shall be considered as read.

6. Provides that all points of order against provisions in the joint resolution, as amended, as waived.

7. Provides one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Summary of Amendments to be Made in Order: 

(summaries derived from information provided by sponsors)

Sponsor

#

Description

1. Rogers, Harold (KY)

#1

Would modify the across-the-board reduction that ensures the resolution is consistent with the total discretionary spending cap in the Budget Control Act of 2011. The amendment is necessary because of a scoring change made after the introduction of the resolution.