H.R. 10 - Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act of 2011 [Original Jurisdiction Matter]

Meeting Time

Wednesday, November 16, 2011 - 2:00pm in H-313 The Capitol View Announcement »

Text of H.R. 10 PDFXML

Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2011

H. Rept. 112-278 Part 1 PDFXML

Report from the Committee on the Judiciary

H. Rept. 112-278 Part 2 PDF

Report from the Committee on Rules (as filed)

Text of H.R. 10 (as ordred reported by the Committee on Rules) PDF

Proposed amendment #1 to H.R. 10, as reported by the Committee on the Judiciary, offered by the Hon. David Dreier (CA) [PDF] Adopted by voice vote.
   AMENDMENTS TO PROPOSED AMENDMENT #1—
   :: Amendment 1a offered by the Hon. Louise McIntosh Slaughter (NY)
    - Failed by record vote 4-6
    :: Amendment 1b offered by the Hon. James P. McGovern (MA)
   - Failed by record vote 4-7
    :: Amendment 1c offered by the Hon. James P. McGovern (MA)
   - Failed by record vote 4-7
   :: Amendment 1d offered by the Hon. Alcee L. Hastings (FL)
   - Failed by record vote 4-7
   :: Amendment 1e offered by the Hon. Alcee L. Hastings (FL)
    - Failed by voice vote
   :: Amendment 1f offered by the Hon. Jared Polis (CO)
   - Failed by vote vote
Proposed amendment #2 to H.R. 10, as reported by the Committee on the Judiciary, offered by the Hon. Pete Sessions (TX) [PDF] Withdrawn.
Would require the agency submitting the report on a proposed Federal rule to include an
assessment of anticipated jobs gained or lost as a result of implementation, and to specify
whether those jobs wil come from the public or private sector. This assessment would be part
of the cost-benefit analysis required to be submitted to the Comptroller General and made
available to each House of Congress prior to consideration of the rule.