H.R. 3003 - No Sanctuary for Criminals Act

Bill Text

    Text of H.R. 3003 PDF XML

    No Sanctuary for Criminals Act (as introduced) 
            ::  Section-by-Section Summary as provided by the Committee on the Judiciary  PDF

Rule Information

REPORTED BY RECORD VOTE of 6-3 on Tuesday, June 27, 2017.

Agreed to by record vote of 235-190, after agreeing to the previous questions by record vote of 235-190 on Wednesday, June 28, 2017.

MANAGERS: Collins/McGovern

1. Closed rule.

2. Provides one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary.

3. Waives all points of order against consideration of the bill.

4. Provides that the bill shall be considered as read.

5. Waives all points of order against provisions in the bill.

6. Provides one motion to recommit.

Amendments (click headers to sort)

#Version #Sponsor(s)PartySummaryStatus
1Version 1Babin (TX)RepublicanWithholds Federal financial assistance from each country that denies or unreasonably delays the acceptance of nationals of such country who have been ordered removed from the United States and to prohibit the issuance of visas to nationals of such country. Submitted
2Version 1Black (TN)RepublicanWithholds certain funds from sanctuary jurisdictions. Specifically, the bill would withhold Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, Economic Development Administration grants, which include, grants for public works, grants for planning and administrative expenses, supplementary grants, and grants for training, research, and technical assistance. FEMA-related grants and trade adjustment assistance grants would still be eligible. CDBG grant withholding is estimated at $2.9B in FY15 and approximately $200M in FY15 for the above mentioned Economic Development Administration grants. Submitted
3Version 1Demings (FL), Thompson, Bennie (MS), Payne, Jr. (NJ)DemocratStrikes COPS grants and Byrne Justice Assistance Grants programs from the list of programs for which states, or political subdivisions of states, that are found not to be in compliance would be ineligible. Also strikes the ability to penalize any other grant program administered by DOJ or DHS.Submitted
4Version 1Demings (FL)DemocratClarifies that, instead of only not being required to report or arrest victims or witnesses of criminal offenses, state and local law enforcement would not be required to undertake any of the required activities with respect to those individuals. Also amends the bill to explicitly specify that victims of domestic violence, sexual assault or sexual abuse are among the individuals excluded from those required activities.Submitted
5Version 1Valadao (CA)RepublicanStrikes ambiguous reference to “motor vehicle law” and inserts reference to (serious vehicle infractions), to ensure that only those who are arrested for criminal and serious motor vehicle violations are detained. Strikes ambiguous probable cause definition. Submitted