/  S. Con. Res. 3—Setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2017...

S. Con. Res. 3 - Setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2017 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2018 through 2026.

Bill Text

  • Text of S. Con. Res. 3 PDF

    Setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2017 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2018 through 2026.
            ::  Section-by-Section Summary, as provided by the Committee on the Budget  PDF

Rule Information

COMMITTEE ACTION:
REPORTED BY RECORD VOTE of 9-3 on Thursday, January 12, 2017.

FLOOR ACTION ON H. RES. 48: 
Agreed to by record vote of 235-188, after agreeing to the previous questions by record vote of 234-179 on Friday, January 13, 2017.

MANAGERS: Woodall/McGovern

1. Structured rule for S. Con. Res. 3. 

2. Provides two hours of general debate with 90 minutes confined to the congressional budget equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Budget and 30 minutes on the subject of economic goals and policies equally divided and controlled by Rep. Tiberi of Ohio and Rep. Carolyn Maloney of New York or their respective designees.  

3. Waives all points of order against consideration of the concurrent resolution. 

4. Makes in order only the amendment printed in the Rules Committee report. Such amendment may be offered only by the Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent and shall not be subject to amendment.

5. Waives all points of order against the amendment printed in the report.   

6. Provides that the concurrent resolution shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question of its adoption.

7. Closed rule for S. 84.

8. Provides 90 minutes of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Armed Services. 

9. Waives all points of order against consideration of the bill. 

10. Provides that the bill shall be considered as read.  

11. Waives all points of order against provisions in the bill. 

12. Provides one motion to commit.   

Amendments (click headers to sort)

#Version #Sponsor(s)PartySummaryStatus
21Version 1Barrag?n, (CA)DemocratEnacts a statement of policy that repealing ACA is dangerous and irresponsible. Submitted
25Version 1Carbajal (CA)DemocratProvides state flexibility by saying that any state in which the ACA has lowered the uninsured rate [all of them] can opt-out of the Republican replace plan.Submitted
7Version 1DelBene (WA)DemocratEnsures reconciliation procedures do not apply if any provision would result in diminished access to healthcare in rural areas.Submitted
8Version 1DelBene (WA)DemocratEnsures reconciliation procedures do not apply if any provision would cap Medicare spending per person, force Medicare enrollees to pay more for care, privatize Medicare, or increase the eligibility age.Submitted
9Version 1DelBene (WA)DemocratEnsures reconciliation procedures do not apply if any provision would result in diminished access to treatment for individuals suffering from substance use disorders, such as opioids.Submitted
14Version 1Higgins (NY)DemocratRequires that any legislative change to the Affordable Care Act shall still allow individuals to be able to remain on their parent’s health insurance until they turn 26. Submitted
3Version 1Jeffries (NY)DemocratEnsures seniors and people with disabilities who have chronic conditions will continue to save billions of dollars because of the fix to the Medicare coverage gap or “doughnut hole.” Submitted
16Version 1Kihuen (NV)DemocratRequires that it would not be in order to consider any legislation considered pursuant to the resolution if such legislation would decrease Medicaid payments or beneficiaries, and would require certification that such legislation would provide an adequate level of access to pediatric care, that any healthcare replacement plan would not harm access to providers, and that the Medicaid expansion portion of the Affordable Care Act would not be harmed under any healthcare replacement plan. Submitted
15Version 1Lee, Barbara (CA), DelBene (WA), Jayapal (WA), Watson Coleman (NJ), Nadler (NY), DeLauro (CT), Slaughter (NY), DeGette (CO), Schakowsky (IL), Speier (CA)DemocratProhibits the use of fast-track budget reconciliation procedures for legislation that limits access to reproductive health and family planning services.Submitted
17Version 1Lieu (CA)DemocratInvests in federal cybersecurity by increasing new budget authority to create a $3.1 billion revolving fund to modernize federal information technology systems in accordance with top priorities.Submitted
23Version 1Lujan Grisham (NM), Doggett (TX), Welch (VT)DemocratExpresses the sense of Congress that rising pharmaceutical costs are a threat to the well-being of the American people, and that Congress has a responsibility to act to improve access to, and affordability of, prescription drugs for all Americans and to hold pharmaceutical companies accountable for the prices they charge for critical medications. Submitted
2Version 1Meehan (PA)RepublicanDirects the Ways and Means and Energy and Commerce Committees that they should not identify savings that would reduce Medicare payment rates, increase to Medicare beneficiaries premiums and cost-sharing, restrict Medicare benefits, or make changes to Medicare eligibility. Submitted
6Version 1Moulton (MA)DemocratProhibits the use of any reconciliation bill to cause veterans of the United States Armed Forces or their dependents from losing access to comprehensive health insurance as a result of repealing all or part of the Affordable Care Act. Submitted
22Version 1Murphy, Stephanie (FL)DemocratEnsures that the House cut-go rule, as well as the respective House and Senate rules prohibiting long-term increases in mandatory spending or deficits, would apply to any legislation designed to replace the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Submitted
4Version 1Nolan (MN)DemocratRequires that no legislation or replacement plan shall include increase on average premiums and average deductibles (or average out-of-pocket costs) related to health insurance coverage. Submitted
19Version 1O'Halleran (AZ)DemocratEnsures that legislation enacted would not increase premiums or out-of-pocket costs for seniors for prescription drugs in Medicare Part D. Prevents any new legislation from re-opening the donut hole. Submitted
24Version 1Panetta (CA)DemocratAllows individuals to choose to keep their ACA health care plan benefits if the ACA is repealed.Submitted
5Version 1Pocan (WI), Ellison (MN), Grijalva (AZ), Schakowsky (IL), Lee, Barbara (CA), Tonko (NY), Nadler (NY), Wilson (FL), Cummings (MD), Wasserman Schultz (FL), Carson (IN), Norton (DC), Cohen (TN), Garamendi (CA), Watson Coleman (NJ), Huffman (CA), Nolan (MN), Raskin (MD), Espaillat (NY), Foster (IL), Meng (NY), Brady, Robert (PA), Conyers (MI), Serrano (NY), Maloney, Carolyn (NY), Maloney, Sean (NY), McGovern (MA), Pascrell (NJ), Bonamici (OR), Lieu (CA), Clark, Katherine (MA), Cicilline (RI), Beatty, (OH), Boyle (PA), DeFazio (OR), Green, Gene (TX), Jeffries (NY), Moore, Gwen (WI), Kildee (MI), S?nchez, Linda (CA), Takano (CA), Frankel (FL), McCollum (MN), O'Halleran (AZ), Lewis, John (GA), Lujan Grisham (NM), Deutch (FL), Chu (CA), Titus (NV), Pingree (ME), Walz (MN)DemocratCreates a point of order against any bill, amendment, motion, joint resolution between the House and Senate, if it results in 1) reduction of guaranteed benefits for Social Security, 2) increase either the early or full retirement age for benefits, 3) privatize social security, 4) result in reduction of guaranteed benefits for Medicare recipients, or 5) result in reduction of benefits or eligibility for individuals enrolled in or eligible to receive medical assistance through a State Medicaid plan or waiver. Submitted
20Version 1Shea-Porter (NH)DemocratEnsures that nothing in the resolution would allow for denial of care based on age, disability, or quality of life.Submitted
18Version 1Walker (NC)RepublicanSUBSTITUTE Includes reforms advocated by House Republicans for several years, putting the federal budget on a path to balance. Includes the exact same reconciliation instruction as S. Con. Res. 3, as well as reserve funds to give Congress the flexibility to repeal and replace Obamacare through a deficit neutral reserve fund. Submitted
1Version 2Yarmuth (KY)DemocratSUBSTITUTE Revised Allows for passage of legislation to create jobs, improve the Nation’s infrastructure, and reform the tax code. This reflects an approach that, as we start a new Congress, looks for areas of bipartisan agreement to make a difference in the lives of Americans families. The amendment would not provide any fast track procedures for efforts related to health care legislation. Made In Order
10Version 1Yarmuth (KY), Lieu (CA)DemocratProhibits the use of fast-track budget reconciliation procedures for legislation that would increase the number of Americans without health insurance or that would return power to insurance companies to discriminate based on pre-existing conditions, set lifetime limits on health insurance benefits, prevent individuals under 26 years of age to be included on their parents’ health care plans, or require individuals to pay out-of-pocket for preventive services. The amendment also protects seniors with Medicare by prohibiting fast-track consideration of legislation that would increase out-of-pocket costs for prescription drugs or make seniors pay more for their overall health care by converting Medicare into fixed-dollar payments for the purchase of private insurance.Submitted
11Version 1Yarmuth (KY)DemocratProhibits the use of fast-track budget reconciliation procedures for legislation that would take away health coverage from millions of people who were able to get health insurance – some for the first time – through Medicaid in the states that took up the Affordable Care Act option to expand their Medicaid programs. Submitted
12Version 1Yarmuth (KY)DemocratProhibits the use of fast-track budget reconciliation procedures for legislation to repeal the Affordable Care Act’s expansion of access to health care coverage, unless the legislation also includes a replacement plan that will provide comprehensive health coverage of at least the same number of people.Submitted
13Version 1Yarmuth (KY)DemocratProhibits the use of fast-track budget reconciliation procedures for legislation that would reduce federal taxes for millionaires while causing millions of Americans to lose health care coverage. Submitted